🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling exasperated and anxious.

Some want additional sea defences to delay the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the options. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, offering a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.