🔗 Share this article

In the eyes of a lifelong Dodgers fan and longtime Mexican American, the crowning moment of the baseball championship did not happen during the nail-biting finale on Saturday, when her team pulled off one dramatic comeback act after another before winning in extra innings against the Toronto Blue Jays.

It happened a game earlier, when two supporting players, the Puerto Rican player and the Venezuelan infielder, executed a thrilling, game-winning play that simultaneously challenged numerous harmful misconceptions touted about Latinos in the past decades.

The moment itself was stunning: the outfielder charged in from left field to snag a ball he initially lost in the bright lights, then fired it to the infield to record another, decisive play. Rojas, positioned nearby, caught the ball just a split second before a opposing player barreled into him, sending him to the ground.

This wasn't just a remarkable sporting moment, perhaps the decisive shift in momentum in the Dodgers' favor after looking for much of the games like the underdog side. To her, it was exhilarating, on multiple levels, a much-required morale boost for Latinos and for Los Angeles after a period of enforcement actions, security forces monitoring the streets, and a steady stream of criticism from official sources.

"Kike and Miggy put forth this alternative story," explained Molina. "The world witnessed Latinos displaying an infectious enthusiasm in what they do, acting as key figures on the team, exhibiting a distinct kind of masculinity. They're bombastic, they're yelling, they're removing their shirts."

"This represented such a contrast with what we observe on the news – raids, Latinos detained and chased down. It's so simple to be demoralized right now."

Not that it's entirely straightforward to be a team fan nowadays – for Molina or for the many of other Latinos who show up regularly to matches and occupy as many as half of the stadium's fifty thousand spots each time.

The Complicated Connection with the Organization

When intensified immigration raids began in Los Angeles in June, and national guard troops were deployed into the area to react to resulting protests, two of the city's soccer clubs promptly issued messages of support with immigrant families – while the Dodgers.

The team president stated the organization want to steer clear of political issues – a view colored, possibly, by the reality that a significant minority of the supporters, even some Hispanic fans, are supporters of certain political figures. Under significant public pressure, the team later committed $one million in support for families personally impacted by the raids but issued no official condemnation of the administration.

Official Event and Past Heritage

Three months earlier, the team did not hesitate in accepting an offer to mark their previous World Series victory at the official residence – a move that local writers labeled as "pathetic … spineless … and hypocritical", considering the team's boast in having been the pioneering professional team to end the color barrier in the 1940s and the frequent invocations of that history and the values it embodies by executives and present and former players. A number of players including the manager had expressed unwillingness to travel to the White House during the initial period but then changed their minds or gave in to pressure from team management.

Corporate Ownership and Supporter Dilemmas

An additional issue for supporters is that the Dodgers are controlled by a corporate behemoth, Guggenheim Partners, whose investments, as per media reports and its own released balance sheets, include a share in a private prison company that operates detention centers. The group's leadership has said repeatedly that it aims to stay out of politics, but its detractors say the silence – and the investment – are their own type of acquiescence to certain agendas.

These factors contribute to significant mixed feelings among Latino supporters in particular – sentiments that emerged even in the excitement of this season's hard-won championship triumph and the following outpouring of Dodgers pride across Los Angeles.

"Is it okay to support the Dodgers?" local writer one observer reflected at the start of the postseason in an thoughtful article pondering on "team loyalty in our blood, but doubt in our minds". He was unable to finally bring himself to view the World Series, but he still felt deeply, to the point that he believed his one-man boycott must have given the team the luck it needed to succeed.

Distinguishing the Players from the Management

Numerous fans who share similar reservations appear to have concluded that they can keep to back the players and its lineup of international players, featuring the Asian superstar Shohei Ohtani, while pouring scorn on the organization's corporate overlords. Nowhere was this more clear than at the championship parade at the home venue on Monday, when the capacity crowd cheered in approval of the manager and his athletes but booed the executive and the chief executive of the investors.

"The executives in formal attire don't get to claim our players from us," Molina said. "We have been with the Dodgers for more time than they have."

Historical Context and Neighborhood Effect

The issue, though, runs deeper than only the organization's present owners. The deal that moved the Brooklyn Dodgers to the city in the 1950s involved the municipality demolishing three working-class Latino neighborhoods on a elevated area above downtown and then selling the property to the organization for a small part of its actual worth. A song on a mid-2000s album that chronicles the events has an low-income worker at the venue stating that the home he lost to eviction is now a part of the field.

A prominent commentator, possibly southern California most influential Latino writer and media personality, sees a darker side to the lengthy, dysfunctional relationship between the team and its fanbase. He calls the team the Flamin' Hot Cheetos of baseball, "a corporate entity with an excessive, even harmful devotion by numerous Latinos" that has been shortchanging its supporters for years.

"They've acted around Latino followers while picking their pockets with the other hand for so long because they have been able to avoid consequences," the writer noted over the summer, when demands to boycott the team over its absence of response to the enforcement actions were upended by the uncomfortable reality that attendance at matches did not dip, even at the height of the protests when the city center was under to a evening restriction.

Global Players and Community Connections

Separating the squad from its corporate owners is not a easy matter, {